Text of talk on

Monetary and Fiscal Strategies

for Ending Inflation

delivered at the

Rotary Club of Kodaikanal

on October 17, 1996

by Imon Ghosh.

Mr. President, fellow Rotarians, Ladies and Gentlemen:

I’ve had the privilege of delivering talks on Monetary and Fiscal Strategies for Ending Inflation earlier on several occasions, including at the Rotary Club of Serampore 7 years ago, and at the Calcutta Management Association a year ago.

I’ll begin by defining inflation, and discussing ways in which it is measured. I shall then share with you a new metaphor I have created to describe the process of inflation. We shall take a look at some historical case studies on the impact that inflation has had on the social fabric. And finally, we’ll look into some specific solutions for reducing inflation and maintaining a healthy equilibrium.

George Bernard Shaw once remarked that “If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion!”

Few economists, however, would dispute the fact that inflation is a process of steadily rising prices resulting in the diminishing purchasing power of a given nominal sum of money.

Classical economic theory defines inflation as an increase in the aggregate (or general) price levels. Prices of individual commodities, seldom stationary, tend to bounce about the place, reflecting the demand and supply situation. An increase (even a sharp one) in the price of a single commodity, therefore, does not necessarily constitute inflation.

… Inflation has also been defined as the time when those who have saved for a rainy day get soaked!

Inflation is measured by a price index (usually the consumer price index or, less frequently, by the GNP deflator). In line with the definition for inflation, this index is derived from a basket of commodities in which each item is assigned a weighted average value according to its presumed importance in the household budget.

Certain limitations exist in the measurement of the consumer price index and these need to be borne in mind: In India, as in other countries, the measurement of the consumer price index is based on the basket of goods bought by the household of an average industrial worker. It may not, therefore, accurately reflect the spending patterns of an upper middle class housewife, or a rural artisan.

It is also useful to bear in mind that the reading of the index can be changed by altering the composition of the basket of commodities, or assigning a different weightage to a particular commodity. India’s consumer price index is also handicapped by the fact that the values assigned to several basic commodities are based on prices prevailing in ration shops – where prices are controlled by the government.

The readings of the price index can also be changed by altering the base year from which price increases are measured. When the base year for the index was changed from 1960 to 1982 in India, the result was a snowballing controversy fueled by some trade unions who claimed they had not been consulted.

Our government also has the amusing propensity of measuring the rate of inflation using the wholesale price index instead of the consumer price index. I, for one, rarely buy articles of personal use wholesale. Perhaps, in deference to the government, I should start doing so …

I have mentioned these limitations in passing to highlight the fact that statistics do not always accurately reflect reality. In the case of our consumer price index, the general feeling appears to be that it tends to understate the actual rate of inflation.

The predominant metaphor for describing the process of inflation is currently the wage-price spiral. Increases in wages lead to increases in prices … which lead to increases in wages, and so on. Elegant though this metaphor may be, I believe it is incomplete because it does not take into account the important role played by the growth of the money supply, and that of productive output.

The metaphor that I’ve suggested to describe the process of inflation is that of a swimming pool, in which the quantity of water corresponds to M3 (or the total sum of money circulating in the economy) and the height of the water corresponds to the aggregate price levels. If there isn’t enough water in our economic pool, we can’t swim – but if the level of water rises too rapidly, some of us may drown.

To add a refinement to this model, picture a beach ball, representing the price of a given commodity, bobbing up and down on the surface of the pool. The ball will not float motionless if there are any ripples of economic activity in our pool. In my metaphor, the bobbing of the beach ball on the surface of the pool corresponds to demand-pull inflation while an increase in the level of the water in the pool, floating the beach ball to greater heights, represents cost-push inflation.

This metaphor can be extended to include price controls. The government sometimes tries to keep the price of a commodity artificially low, which can be likened to holding our beach ball beneath the surface of the pool of water. There will inevitably be a strong tendency for the ball – as there are for the prices – to rise to a state of equilibrium (in this analogy, the surface of the pool).

The opposite also happens to be true. It would be possible to hold our ball above the surface of the water, but it will only remain there as long as the hand that is holding it up (government regulated price floors) doesn’t let go, when the ball, unable to support itself, will return rapidly to equilibrium …

To add a further refinement to our model, let us assume that we enlarged our swimming pool by 6 % during the course of the year. If we do not add any water to the pool, the level of the water is going to drop. If we increase the quantity of the water in the pool by 6 %, the level of the water will remain the same. However, if we pump in water at a faster pace than the growth in the total size of the pool, the level of the water will inevitably increase.

Who controls the amount of water that is pumped into our economic pool? The government, through the Reserve Bank, regulates the money supply (or the flow of water into our pool) in one of two ways: By simply printing the money, or through a stroke of the bookkeeper’s magic pen. As Peter Drucker noted, “When government talks about `raising capital’, it means printing it.”

What happens when the level of water in our economic pool rises at a rapid clip? Larger sections of the population find their noses beneath water. The decrease in purchasing power undermines the ability of companies to sell the goods they produce. This leads to stagflation. Capital formation is adversely affected, and so is productive output. The nation’s currency is depreciated on foreign exchange markets. Carried far enough, inflation can pave the way for social disorder and economic chaos.

This was certainly true of the Weimar Republic during the 1920s, when a wheelbarrow loaded with currency notes could not buy a loaf of bread. The accumulated savings of entire families were wiped out almost overnight. Breadwinners were unable to provide their dependents with even the basic necessities of life. Something snapped. The social fabric gave way. The resulting economic and social turmoil laid the foundation for Nazism. History is rich with examples of the effects that inflation, and hyperinflation, can have on society. This pernicious influence goes beyond the economic sphere and into the social.

Other examples of hyperinflation include Russia after the first world war, where prices sometimes doubled from one day to the next, resulting from the fact that the Tsar found it convenient to finance his expenses, as well as the war, by printing additional currency. A similar inflation in China under Chiang Kai-Shek after the Second World War led to similar results.

Present day examples of economies reeling under inflation include several of the countries that emerged as independent states with the break up of the former Soviet Union. Dr. Ben Johnson, a colleague who teaches physics at the Kodaikanal International School, visited Russia in February 1994. When he arrived in Moscow, the exchange rate was 1,620 Russian roubles for 1 US dollar. When he left Russia 10 days later, the exchange rate had deteriorated to 1,790 roubles for each dollar (a ten percent decline in as many days …)!

The end of the sixties saw a spurt in inflation in a number of economies. According to the IMFs International Financial Statistics, in 1970, fifty seven countries had rates of inflation ranging from zero to five percent. By 1979, this number was down to twelve. On the other hand, no nation in 1970 had a rate of inflation of fifty percent or above. In 1979, there were eight countries in this category. The 1970s can therefore be described as a decade of escalating inflation.

The 1980s saw the successful implementation of anti-inflation programmes in several economies, including those of the United States, Britain and India. These nations, however, have learnt not to rest on their economic laurels, since inflation is both an unstable, and destabilizing phenomenon.

Now, coming to specific solutions: The way to reduce inflation, and create an environment that is conducive for economic development, is to promote sound monetary and fiscal policies. These would include …

A. Greater autonomy for the central bank (… in India’s case, the Reserve Bank) from short-term political pressures.

B. Ensuring that there isn’t “too much money chasing too few goods” by restricting the growth of the money supply to the growth in productive output (or GNP).

The manner in which we control the growth of our money supply reminds me of the `Vector Theory of Systems’, which states that systems run better when designed to run downhill!

C. Facilitating the process of deregulation (which, inspite of `economic liberalization’, isn’t yet complete), without which India will remain a high cost, and uncompetitive, economy.

An amusing example of the regulatory red tape from the not too distant past is the government of India’s requirement that exporters fill in over 50 different forms before a single consignment of their goods could leave India’s shores to compete in world markets, even as the government exhorted them to export more in the nation’s best interests.

D. Encouraging policies that channel scarce economic resources, and savings, to the most productive sectors of the economy. India has invested over one trillion (one lakh crore) rupees in a largely underperforming public sector which has contributed to India’s huge, and growing, fiscal deficit.

It might be stated here in passing that these solutions are not easy to implement, and require considerable political will and social support  –  especially in relation to the control of the money supply.  This is because the government benefits from inflating the money supply – at least in the short term! The government is the first user of all the money it creates. Inflation allows it to repay its debts with cheaper rupees, as well as benefit from bracket creep.

Milton Friedman, noted monetary economist and Nobel prize winner, estimates that an excessive growth in the money supply takes around six months to find its way through a healthy economy before being transformed into aggregate price increases. Sooner for an economy less healthy.

This brief period between monetary expansion and inflation is characterized by general economic euphoria, greater output, higher employment – and needless to say, greater government spending.

Then, the `morning after’, comes the hangover …

In economic terms this means lower output, higher unemployment and greater inflation. The government at this point can do one of two things: The hangover isn’t a permanent state of affairs (they seldom are), and can be allowed to run its course. Or, the government can ease the hangover by inflating the money supply yet again.

As Dr. Lawrence J. Peter puts it, “Affairs of state are operated so that one generation pays for the debts of the last generation by issuing bonds payable by the next generation.”

If we want to see an end to inflation, and its associated economic distortions like higher interest rates and lower capital investment, the government must be discouraged from living beyond its means on deficit financing.

In formulating fiscal, and monetary policy, it is important to avoid being short-sighted: A politician is credited with the insight that a week, in politics, is a very long time. Inflation, unfortunately, takes longer to cure.

Like our blood pressure, the money supply and its velocity of circulation seldom attracts our attention, or elicits our concern, unless something goes terribly wrong. The guardians of our currency owe it to the rest of us not to compromise long-term stability for short-term growth.

What are the implications of all this for those of us present here? To begin with, all of us would like to protect our savings and investments from the ravages of inflation. The first step is to discount the returns on our investments by the rate of inflation, to get a clear picture of what our real returns are (for example, a savings bank account currently earns an interest of only 5 %; whenever the rate of inflation exceeds 5 % – which is most of the time ! – the real returns on this kind of account will be negative).

If you are involved in implementing a large project, it would be in your interests to complete it at the earliest possible date, to avoid escalations in project costs. And since business invariably gets blamed for inflation, without reference to the steadily declining value of the rupee, I would suggest that you monitor the escalating costs of inputs in your industries, and communicate these to your customers, opinion leaders and the government … as frequently as necessary!

A belief shared by many public speakers is that, “To be seen, you must stand up. To be heard, you must speak out. To be appreciated, you must sit down.” I have perhaps spoken longer than I should have …

To sum up, we have defined inflation in this talk, and discussed ways in which it is measured. I’ve had the privilege of sharing with you a new metaphor that I have created to describe the process of inflation. We have delved into history for case studies on the impact that inflation has had on the social fabric. And finally, we’ve looked at some specific solutions for reducing inflation and maintaining a healthy equilibrium.

I would be happy to answer any questions that you may have.

Thank you.

Imon

http://www.linkedin.com/in/imonghosh

http://www.ecademy.com/user/imonghosh

http://www.naymz.com/search/imon/ghosh/2376471

http://imonghosh.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/exploring-solutions-to-economic-downturn/

I would like to wish you, your family and colleagues a fruitful, happy and prosperous 2009!

If you’d like to explore possible solutions to the current economic downturn, financial sector reforms, accelerating economic growth, and achieving the UN’s poverty-related Millennium Development Goals, additional details are available on the links below …

The principles outlined can be applied to reduce poverty and accelerate economic growth across developing countries, as well as empower disadvantaged / excluded groups in developed countries.

My paper on Reducing Poverty and Accelerating Economic Growth has been included in the syllabus at the National University of Juridical Sciences. It was abridged and published on the Editorial page in all editions of The Times of India on 4th April 2001, and noted in the records of the Indian Parliament. It could help the United Nations achieve its poverty-related Millennium Development Goals.

The paper on Reducing Poverty and Accelerating Economic Growth (which is currently being expanded into a book) is available at:

http://civilsociety.developmentgateway.org/uploads/media/civilsociety/Reducing%20Rural%20Poverty.pdf

A summary of the ideas are presented below  -  as part of a submission I’ve made to Google’s Project 10 raised to 100 (http://www.project10tothe100.com/).

What one sentence best describes your idea?

Reduce poverty, reform the financial sector, and accelerate economic growth by creating a refinance market that bridges formal and traditional financial sectors.

Describe your idea in more depth:

According to Professor Michael Todaro, the problems of widespread poverty, growing inequality, rapid population growth and rising unemployment all find their origins in the stagnation of economic life in rural areas. There can be no national development without rural development (Michael Todaro, Development Economics).

The economic prospects for rural development are far from bleak (indeed, they show an astonishing robustness):

In comparison to heavy industry which employs a mere 3 million workers in India, small scale and cottage industries (despite their comparatively restricted access to credit) employ over 30 million people.

Unlike heavy industry, small scale and cottage industries can be located throughout the country, facilitating the dispersion of economic wealth rather than its concentration.

However, the rural economy’s development potential – and with it, the growth prospects of the entire economy – are not going to be achieved without the availability of (a) affordable credit, (b) in adequate quantities, (c) at the right time.

While the modern financial sector in India offers affordable credit that enables enterprise and fuels economic growth, it falls short in all other criteria (which the informal sector excels in, including a presence in 600,000 Indian villages that have no branch banks, and loan recovery rates that approach 100%).

Since the informal financial sector’s strengths are the modern financial sector’s weakness (and vice versa), I propose a refinance market that bridges the two sectors to leverage each other’s strengths.

Describe the optimal outcome should your idea be selected and successfully implemented. How would you measure it?

Several billion people without access to affordable credit (at say 12% per annum instead of 120% or even 1200%!) will now have it, enabling the creation and growth of sustainable micro-enterprises.

Imagine the impact on the economy if 700 plus million people in rural India alone had an extra twenty thousand rupees or more to spend every year! This would create a powerful engine for growth not just for India but the world economy!

One good measure for the success of this idea is whether it significantly contributes to the achievement of the United Nation’s poverty-related Millennium Development Goal of halving, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people whose income is less than $1 a day, a goal that currently looks elusive.

If you’d like to recommend a specific organization, or the ideal type of organization, to execute your plan, please do so here.

The United Nations system, Federal Reserve banks and financial market regulators.

More details are available if you scroll down my Ecademy profile page:

http://www.ecademy.com/user/imonghosh

Grateful for your thoughts on how we can bring these ideas to a tipping point, and make them happen for the benefit of several billion people around the globe!

With all good wishes,

Imon

http://www.linkedin.com/in/imonghosh
http://www.ecademy.com/user/imonghosh
http://www.naymz.com/search/imon/ghosh/2376471